Jane Campion’s “The Power of the Dog” has captivated audiences and critics alike, earning significant Oscar buzz. While undeniably a visually stunning and emotionally complex film, its portrayal of LGBTQ+ characters and its underlying themes warrant a closer examination. This analysis delves into the film’s narrative, performances, and its adherence to, or subversion of, common cinematic tropes, particularly concerning trauma and representation.
The film transports viewers to 1920s Montana, centering on two brothers, George (Jesse Plemons) and Phil (Benedict Cumberbatch), who own a ranch. George is depicted as a kind but lonely individual, while Phil is a more enigmatic and seemingly cruel figure, whose actions mask a deeper vulnerability. The narrative takes a turn when George marries Rose (Kirsten Dunst), a widow with a college-age son named Peter (Kodi Smit-McPhee). This addition to the household inevitably sparks conflict, creating a dynamic that has been compared to biblical narratives, albeit with a darker, Hitchcockian undertone.
Benedict Cumberbatch’s performance as Phil Burbank has been particularly lauded, placing him in contention for Best Actor. His portrayal is indeed powerful, capturing a character whose torment and psychological complexity are central to the film’s narrative. However, the film’s decision to reveal Phil’s deeply closeted homosexuality as a primary source of his torment has been a point of contention. This narrative choice, critics argue, risks reinforcing a problematic trope that equates LGBTQ+ identity with trauma and suffering. While the film’s defenders suggest Campion is deconstructing Western masculinity, some feel it ultimately perpetuates a long-standing cliché that limits the portrayal of LGBTQ+ individuals in cinema.
The film’s themes have also drawn commentary from actors within the Western genre itself. Sam Elliott, a veteran of Westerns, publicly criticized aspects of “The Power of the Dog,” specifically questioning the depiction of cowboys in chaps and shirtless scenes as inauthentic to the American West. This critique highlights a broader discussion about authenticity and representation in the genre. The argument that homosexual themes are inappropriate in a Western is akin to suggesting car chases have no place in cop movies; the genre, like any other, can evolve and incorporate diverse narratives.
Phil Burbank’s character is responsible for relentlessly tormenting his brother and sister-in-law, leading Rose down a path of alcoholism and isolation. The film’s exploration of his sadism, linked to his repressed sexuality, raises questions about the necessity of humanizing such a character through this specific lens. Instead of moving away from demonization, the film’s explanation for Phil’s behavior could be seen as an attempt to justify it through his internal struggle, rather than exploring the impact of his actions directly.
In the race for Best Picture, “The Power of the Dog” is often pitted against “CODA,” a film about the hearing child of deaf adults. While “CODA” may not possess the same psychological depth or visual artistry as “The Power of the Dog,” it offers a heartfelt and accessible narrative about family and love. In contrast, “The Power of the Dog,” despite its artistic merit, is described as grimly repressed. The current cultural climate, marked by recent hardships, may favor stories of connection and hope, such as “CODA,” or the powerful performances in “King Richard” and “tick, tick…BOOM!” over prolonged narratives of suffering.
Ultimately, the question remains: what is the enduring message of “The Power of the Dog”? Despite its high artistic quality, the film’s conclusion offers little in terms of a deeper truth or redemptive arc. Phil’s death, rather than signifying a grander meaning, appears to bring an end to the suffering of his victims and, perhaps, to the audience’s own endurance of the film’s pervasive gloom. While the film’s craftsmanship is undeniable, its thematic focus on trauma as a defining characteristic of its LGBTQ+ character warrants critical discussion about its place in contemporary cinema.
The film’s exploration of masculinity and repression, while artistically compelling, treads a fine line. The discourse surrounding its Oscar success invites a conversation about the kind of stories Hollywood chooses to celebrate and the potential impact of these narratives on broader cultural perceptions. As filmmakers continue to explore complex human emotions and societal issues, the challenge remains to do so in ways that are both artistically innovative and ethically considerate of representation.
Related:
